Obama and Terrorists � or is it Obama and the Sunni Muslims?
Posted by Andrea Ryan on Thursday, August 29, 2013, 6:45 AM
In an article in the Independent, Robert Fisk points out that if Obama
attacks Syrian leader Assad�s army, the US and Al Qaeda would be on
the same side. However, Fisk incorrectly states that this would be
the first time. Not so. As Gateway Pundit pointed out in prior
posts, Obama was on the same side as Al Qaeda in Libya when bombing
Gaddafi and his forces. Obama, also, sided with the terrorist
organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, in Egypt, even providing them
with $1.5 billion in aid, and then taking it away after they were
overthrown.
Pundits have tried to figure out Obama�s motives. Some say Obama is
driven by anti -colonialism like his father. Obama�s anti-colonialism
makes sense, but doesn�t address all of Obama�s motives in the Middle
East, or necessarily his attacks against Christians and Jews. Others
say that Obama is on the side of Islamists, which doesn�t address his
siding with one Islamist group (Al Qaeda) over another Islamist group,
or Islamist group wannabe like Assad. What does make sense is Obama�s
policy of always siding with the Muslim Sunni sect.
As Barry Rubin at PJ Media points out, Muslim Sunnis have been at odds
with Muslim Shia�s, and vice versa, for a long time. Shia
representatives Iran and Hezbollah support Assad. Sunni
representatives, including Al Qaeda, support the Islamic rebels and
the Muslim Brotherhood. Sunnis account for about 80% of the Muslim
world. When Obama moves, he moves not with Christians, Jews or the
majority of most Americans, Obama moves with the Muslim Sunni sect.
The Sunni hatred of Shia�s, Jews and Americans is what Obama�s actions
fit best. In addition, an Iranian involvement in the attack on
Benghazi, is consistent with this thinking, because the Shia�s in Iran
would not be happy with the US sending weapons to the Sunni rebels in
Syria, who are the enemy of Assad and the Iranian Shia�s. The Iranian
Shia�s would want to stop weapons used in overthrowing Assad, while
bringing to light the fact that Obama was shipping arms under the
table to Syria in the first place. Iran was hoping the poor press of
the Benghazi affair would prevent Obama from being reelected.
Unfortunately for the Iranian Shia�s, the Obama loving American media
did not comply.
CB
Hillary doesn't seem to care that she has no direct form of
communication with her Ambassador on the anniversary of 9/11, in the
most dangerous part of the (world) middle east. Ambassador Stevens was
on record trying to find where Moammar Gadhafi's enormous weapons
stash went to after (Obama community organized) Moammar's downfall
(murder) as reported last night by Richard Ingle on NBC Nightly News.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/
We'll not forget your role at Benghazi, Hillary.
You ignored Ambassador Stevens three requests for increased security.
Your lie under oath you couldn't 'possibly distinguish your
ambassador's email from the million you received last year' is an
ignorant lie.
In summer of 2011 Ambassador Stevens' was attacked. Only by the grace
of God and US Marines were terrorists defeated from killing him then!
The British compound was attacked and they left! The Chinese were
attacked in that Hell hole and left but yet our Ambassador was left
there, denied the security he requested from you, three times.
You abandoned your ambassador to be murdered by Obama's new friends in
the Muslim Brotherhood. We'll not let you forget that, nor your HOH
supporters.
Hillary's Southern Strategy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
No comments:
Post a Comment