Thursday, September 27, 2012

Anti-Islam Film Probably Made By/For Terrorists, Becile Associated With Terrorists

Says it was a scam funded by scams that he already got arrested for, and his friends are friends of Muslim militants, not jews or copts.

The Film 'Innocence of Muslims' — Made By Terrorists? | FrontPage ...
1 day ago – The Film 'Innocence of Muslims' — Made By Terrorists? .... Why did the maker of this movie, Sam Becile, claim he was an Israeli Jew and why ...

Were “Sam Bacile” and “The Innocence of Muslims” Part of a Salafi Plot All Along?

Were “Sam Bacile” and “The Innocence of Muslims” Part of a Salafi Plot All Along?

The cartoon riots were touched off by pictures of Mohammed faked by Salafis. It is highly probable that the current wave of Salafi violence was touched off by a movie created by a Salafist claiming to be an Israeli Jew who had raised 5 million dollars from “100 Jews” with Coptic Christians and actors who were both unaware of how they were being exploited by a radical Islamist movement.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Ideological DNA fingerprint of "innocence of Muslims/ Bin Laden" Point To Terrorist State

Note - this is an early draft, but this speak for the dozens of people who suspected early on that the "attack of the anti-muslim youtube video" was manufactured by terrorist who tricked americans into helping them make a film which could then be used to target American, Israel, Copts, and ultimate the american ambassador of Libya.

Youtube routinely takes down videos which make islamists look bad such as memri translations, as well as nazi and pro-al queda and anwar al-awlaki videos, porn and racism, but if there is any possibility that a terrorist state or organization was responsible for the video, it should be taken down by youtube which can cause enormous harm because of its scale.

The Innocence / Attack of the Anti-Islamic Movie

Four Americans including Ambassador Christopher Stevens were killed by what appears to be the first successful Sept 11 attack since 9 Arabs hijacked four airliners under the banner of militant Islamism in 2001. It took the Obama administration a week to acknowledge that just maybe it was a terrorist attack. That shouldn’t be too surprising since they still officially classify the 2009 Fort Hood shootings, the worst terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11 as a “workplace violence” incident. Obama never acknowledged any  direct relationship to the religion or politics of the shooter who had asked no less than Imam Anwar al-Awlaki, later killed by drones for terrorism and spiritual advisor to the Pentagon hijackers for religious guidance on shooting US soldiers.

But this time, it seems as if terrorists hijacked a seemingly innocent Youtube video instead of airliners as the battering ram of choice. The film was widely reported to insult and depict the “Islamic Prophet Muhammad as a womanizing fraud”. The press widely reported that it was outrage over the film that was the rallying cry of protesters who scaled the walls of the American embassy in Egypt and scrawled graffiti honoring Osama bin Laden, and flying an Islamist flag typically flown by Al Queda. No evidenced of any connection to terrorism there. 3 protesters were killed in the Iranian client state of Sudan near the U.S. embassy, and another in Lebanon. Another 3 were killed at the embassy in Tunis, spark of the Arab spring so celebrated by Obama where protesters shouted “Obama! Obama! We are all Osama!” Obviously, Obama’s commitment to a more cordial relationship with the muslim world is going to take a second term to show a positive effect.  Even the Taliban took part in the protests, trashing 8 of 10 Harrier jets which had been moved to a giant helicopter base over the summer. Not even the Viet Cong in Vietnam had succeeded in destroying so many planes or breaking in to base.

But as the American right wing circled their wagons around free speech and argued that the violence had nothing to do with the video, I noticed a few things amiss, and wondered if Al Queda or somebody else had actually commissioned the video as a tool to attack the United States, Israel, Egyptian Copts and the counter-jihad movment all in one. This Sam Becile filmmaker seems to be the one bad character that has a history of committing crimes and serial lying, infiltrating Copt groups in the United States and tricking them into producing movie which was first promoted as if it were an Al Queda terrorist recruiting movie, and then promoted as a movie which goes out of its way to insult The Prophet.

What has only been reported in blogs is that the original title of the movie was “The Innocence of Bin Laden”, which implies sympathy for the hero of Al Queda terrorists.  people in Hollywood spotted a promotional poster in Arabic advertising its theatrical showing in Arabic, and a couple of people took pictures. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) noticed advertisements in the paper and they wondered if “it was  some kind of pro-jihadist movie  Hollywood blogger, John Walsh was also alarmed by the title of the film, saying "There is an alarming event occurring in Hollywood .. We have no idea what this group is." The blog site reported that the June 30 screening had been canceled.

Oddly for a movie widely quoted as being anti-muslim, the poster did not denigrate Muslims, but rather referred to "my Muslim brother". In a translation provided by the ADL, the poster stated it would reveal "the real terrorist who caused the killing of our children In Palestine, and our brothers in Iraq and Afghanistan." Steven Klein’s excuse for the title was that their plan was to attract terrorists to see the movie and then enrage them.

Photo by Current TV producer  "By the name of Allah almighty, and for the occasion of Ramadan, the holy month, may it always bring bless...etc... We announce the big movie: Innocence of Ben Laden. For the same time in international cinema, see, my Muslim brethren, the real terrorist holding the evidence of his guilt, that terrorist which caused the deaths of our children in Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq."

However, that does not fully explain the coded language. The language appears to not only revere Islam, but the radical variety espoused by Osama Bin Laden. Who is this true terrorist that kills Muslims in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan?  The answer is obscure to most Americans but easy for those familiar with pro-Palestine pro-Arab propaganda – the USA. Residents of Ramallah in the West Bank consider Bin Laden to not only be innocent, but a hero. Colin Nickerson of the Boston Globe on the first anniversary of 9/11 in 2002 got this quote from a resident said Ahmed Rezak Shamasneh whose house was destroyed by Israeli tanks: ''America is the true terrorist ''It is the ally of Israel, which is killing our people [in Palestine]. It is the country that drops bombs on poor Afghans.''

If you google search “bin laden innocent”, the first article that shows up is “Osama bin Laden: Closing the Case on an Innocent Man” which condemns the killing of Bin Laden and argues that the alleged terrorist was innocent. That’s an ususual position for an American named named Gordon Duff who claims to be an Marine who is editor of a website for veterans called Veterans Today.  He claims: that “He knew nothing of Al Qaeda, never planned 9/11, never advocated terrorism, not once”. The REAL terrorist? “Bin Laden condemns terrorism and says that the US government, Israel and the press are using terrorism against the American people in order to frighten them into going to war, the endless war going on today”. Who kills muslims in Afghanistan? “bin Laden refers to the invasion of Afghanistan as a Jewish crusade… Mossad operations…have been responsible for training and supplying the Taliban inside Pakistan” Who killed muslims in Iraq? “the attack on Iraq is now known to have been planned as part of the Project for a New American by Israeli citizens inside the United StatesPalestine? In the letter by Usama Bin Ladin “to the Pakistani people, ““All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel.”

What is Veterans Today? The Anti-defamation League (ADL) notes VT continues the tradition of the neo-Nazi American Free Press (AFP)  conspiracy-oriented newspaper in promoting anti-Semitic 9/11 conspiracy theories. VT is just one of a vast network of anti-Israel, pro-Iran conspiracists who “blame Israel for numerous nefarious deeds and false flag operations”. ADL notes that Gordon Duff is the senior editor of the “the anti-Semitic Web site Veterans Today”, claiming “Israelis and Jewish members of the Bush Administration carried out the 9/11 attacks as a false flag operation to provoke a war against Israel's enemies.”  These articles are “picked up by the conspiracy press, the extreme right press, and elsewhere, including Islamic media sources in the United States an in arab countries and Pakistan, connecting 9/11 attacks to claims regarding Israeli mistreatment of the Palestinians, making the 9/11 theories part and parcel of an overall anti-Israel agenda.”  Duff claims that every attack blamed on arabs or Al Queda was  actually a “false flag” attack from 9-11 to the USS Cole bombing. Canadian author Michael Ross described VT as a "dubious Holocaust-denying journa

Accoring to Duff’s biography on Veterans Today, Gordon Duff  is the “military affairs analyst for Press TV, is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest” , which means he actually works for an official Iranian government agency and acts as one of the US-based spokesmen. Not surprisingly, everything he says matches the official position of the Iranian government.

While few have directly accused Gordon Duff of being an agent of Iran, Mike Fegelman executive director of pro-Israel HonestReporting Canada called Iran’s Press TV “Iran’s Hateful Mouthpiece in Canada” which , featuring reports which “disseminate radical propaganda and spew anti-Semitic tropes.” He noted Calgary based Josh Blakeney, like the Iranian government, promoted promoted 9/11 conspiracy theories blaming Israel’s Mossad, and writes for Veterans Today. Fegelman called the PressTVB reporter a shill for the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program who mourned for Iranian nuclear scientists.  

In the 1950s, black poet Frank Marshall Davis was recognized as being an agent for Stalinist Russia as a member of the Communist Party of the USA by the FBI and congressional committees from this anti-American newspaper articles. But today, America doesn’t have anyone in the government investigating if America’s new enemies such as Iran still main newspapers and websites which are radical Islamist fronts instead of communist fronts.
It is certainly possible, indeed consider the small number of people and organizations who boldly proclaim  the “innocence of Bin Laden” that the same people who write his materials also wrote that propaganda poster. It is like an ideological  fingerprint or DNA. Nobody else so boldy proclaims the innocence of bin laden than amadinijad of Iran, nor proclaims so much outrage over deaths of muslims in Palestine, iraq and Afghanistan.  From Veterans Today, you can easily trace the massive network supported by Iran – Alex Jones, Rense, Willis Carto / American free press and Ron Paul supporters.

Duff and a network of other writers on Veterans Today immediately began a massive disinformation campaign of conspiracy theories blaming the CIA, Mossad, Copts, “extremist Christians”, Israel and the US. Alexander Higgins and commenter trolls blame Saudi Arabia, which Iran and ex-CIA analyst Michael Sheurer considers its Sunni arch-rival to its Shia brand of Islam. So far no one on the internet even suspects Iran could have anything to do with this even though we know Iran tried to kill the Saudi ambassador. Max Blumenthal was the first to tie the film to geller and Spencer, he’s definitely working for Iran as well.

So even if we don’t have direct evidence, we need to speculate and investigate if the speculation could be true – that Iran recruited an agent to infiltrate the Copts and counter-jihad circles such as Pam Geller and Robert Spencer, and give him a modest budget to get Americans and Copts to help him create a deceptive film which could later be modified into an grotesquely anti-Muslim video insulting the Prophet. This film would then be blamed on, and target Israel, Coptic Christians, and the United States, leverage youtube to give a seemingly silly video the impact of multiple airliner crashes and inflame a global jihad against American embassies including assassinating the US ambassador to the government hated and opposed primarily by Iran. They knew that the western press would dutifully report “outrage over the anti-muslim video insulting the prophet”, without anyone suspecting or even speculating about a “false flag” attack except for numerous spurious “false flag conspiracy theories blaming everyone except the obvious prime candidate for a terrorist state that had the means and motive .  This was the same pattern that alleged “radical Christian counter-jihadist” Anders Breivik, who did everything that one normally associates with an Al Queda attack, except that he claimed to be doing it for Christian counter-jihadist who all denounced him, and again, no one in the media or even the right wing blogosphere even suspected that Breivik might have been created precisely in the manner that pro-jihad conspiracy theorists always propose that every Al Queda attack was a Jewish attack to blame muslim terrorists.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Taliban Attack Destroys Six Harriers at Camp Bastion in World War 9-11

  1. There should now be no doubt that the Attack of the anti-Muslim Film is a worldwide coordinated war which has reached a new level when attacks on Camp Bastion were justified by outrage over the video. 

    When you combine this is violent protests across embassies in over 20 nations in the middle east, an apparent jihad SEAL strike team  armed with armored vehicles, 14.5 anti-aircraft/armor guns, flak vests, rpgs, and enough flexibility and command / control to mount a 2nd attack on US forces sent to aid victims of the first strike, and even phone threats to colleges across the US, it should be clear this is no protest, it is not even terrorism, it is an integral part of a coordinated war effort, likely with backing of a major nation state terrorist military power.

     While the Obama administration is trying to pin the blame on a few "crazy and misguided" film maker and outraged zealots, only the Republicans were the first to call it an Al Queda operation, and an act of war. 

    Initial reports were that two harriers were damaged, now it is 6 destroyed and 2 are only good for parts. No one has has as much success in destroying US aircraft on the ground since  the Vietcong attacks in South Vietnam which forced the US to house fighters in bomb-proof shelters. 

    Camp Bastion is the main British military base in Afghanistan. Accommodating 28,000 people it is situated northwest of Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand Province, and exists to be the logistics hub for operations in Helmand.[2] It is the largest British overseas military camp built since World War II.[3]
    Built in early 2006 by 39 Engineer Regiment, the camp is situated in a remote desert area, far from population centres. Four miles long by two miles wide, it has a busy airfield and a field hospital and originally had full accommodation for the 2000 men and women.[4]
    The base is divided into 2 main parts, Bastion 1 and Bastion 2. Bastion 2 includes two tenant camps, Camp Barber (US) and Camp Viking (DK). Bastion also adjoins Camp Leatherneck (US) and the Afghan National Army (ANA) Camp Shorabak. Westland WAH-64 Apache and Boeing CH-47 Chinook helicopters are forward-deployed at the Heliport. [No mention of harrier base or attack yet ]
    The Taliban threatened Prince Harry after announcement of his deployment: 

    A Taliban spokesman had said days after the announcement of Harry's deployment that they would try to kill him while he's in Helmand Province.
    "We will do our best to kill Prince Harry and Britain's other troops based in Helmand," Zabihullah Mujahid said. "It is not important for us to kidnap him. We will target him and we will kill him."

    News: Taliban fighters wore US Army uniforms in attack on Prince Harry's base

    The Associated Press‎ - 3 hours ago
      The Taliban fighters who launched an assault on the British base where ... destroyed six AmericanHarrier jets and badly damaged another two.
  2. Taliban Attack Afghanistan US-British Base, Kill 2 US Marines ... › International
    1 day ago – Taliban fighters today launched a complex and sustained attack on the large U.S.-British military base in Southern ... A Defense official said two Harrier fighter jets flown by U.S. Marines were damaged in the attack. Master Sgt.

    We need to find out who these people are, who trained  them and who supported them. These are not local peasants. 

    Eighteen insurgents were killed and one was wounded after they were able to "penetrate" the base's security, accordin to the International Security Assistance Force.
    ISAF officials said the attack was focused on the flightline - where aircraft were parked.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Iran's Ayatollah For Ronwar al-Pawlaki

From Republican Security Council:

THE AYATOLLAH APPROVES: Ron Paul is First To Criticize Israel and First to Defend Iran

by Republican Security Council on Saturday, September 17, 2011 at 8:03pm
The Islamic Republic of Iran is today at the pinnacle of the Axis of Evil. They refer to the United States as a “Satanic power,” but they have a consistent champion in the U.S. Congress who has defended their policies and propaganda in numerous debates. He claims Israel has established a "concentration camp" in Gaza, but when it comes to Iran his attitude is see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil against the Islamic Republic.
  • For over 30 years they have had an annual “Death to America” holiday, and the Tehran regime describes the USA as “the Great Satan,” while Israel is the “Little Satan.” 
  • Their hostility has been apparent since they came to power in 1979 and held American hostages for 444 days.  
  • The Ayatollah's admirer is Ron Paul, who is the only Republican Member of Congress who has consistently opposed every anti-Iranian resolution, and never fails to justify their actions. 
  • Their state television has run stories such as “Ron Paul Blasts U.S. Policy on Iran,” where the lawmaker is praised for advocating the end of all U.S. assistance to Israel and his opposition to the "unconstitutional" raid which killed Osama bin Laden.  
  • Paul is against resolutions criticizing Iran because he does not want America to comment on the “internal affairs” of another nation. That never stops the Congressman when Israel is concerned. The isolationists of the 1930s said the same thing, and to them the persecution of the Jews was an internal German matter. 
  • According to Paul's logic, all human rights abuses should be ignored. The cruel Tehran regime executes young women for behavior which is normal in the United States. The girls are gang raped prior to their execution because the Mullahs don't want them to "die as virgins." They believe "virgins go straight to heaven." Human rights organizations describe Iran as one big prison for women.
  • Paul is a vigorous foe of all foreign aid, but there is one exception. He supports full funding for the Palestinian Authority.
During the August 11, 2011 GOP presidential debate in Iowa, Paul said "We started it in 1953 when we sent in a coup, installed the Shah, and the reaction — the blowback came in 1979. It’s been going on and on because we just plain don’t mind our own business. That’s our problem."
  • This is not a new viewpoint, and in 2002 he said "The tired assertion that America 'supports democracy' in the Middle East is increasingly transparent. It was false 50 years ago, when we supported and funded the hated Shah of Iran to prevent nationalization of Iranian oil, and it's false today when we back an unelected military dictator in Pakistan."
  • The “blowback” theory is one of his favorite allegations, and he has made 10 speeches on the House floor during the past five years on this topic. 
  • He not only excuses Iran’s behavior but says “We need to take out the CIA,” and wants the agency abolished.
  • In 2005, Ron Paul was the only Republican lawmaker who refused to vote for a resolution condemning Iran’s President after he said “Israel should be wiped off the map,” and called for a "world without Zionism. . . Like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation. The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm.” He also warned Europe that it should support his country’s nuclear program or “suffer the consequences.”
  • Paul supporters are defending the Congressman by claiming the actual translation of what President Ahmadinejad said was, "drive the Israelis into the sea". That does not significantly change his meaning, and the late Ayatollah Khomenei, the father of the Islamic Revolution, said the same thing. The "wiped off the map" quote was first disseminated by the Islamic Republic News Agency, Iran's official propaganda arm. They used this phrase in the English version of their news releases covering the World Without Zionism conference.
  • On June 20, 2007, Paul and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) were the only two lawmakers to vote against the Rothman-Kirk Resolution, which calls on the United Nations to charge Ahmadinejad with violating the genocide convention of the United Nations Charter based on his numerous statements.
  • On June 19, 2009, the House voted to pass H Res 560 by a 405 to 1 margin. Dr. Paul was the sole opponent and the resolution was entitled: "Expressing support for all Iranian citizens who embrace the values of freedom, human rights, civil liberties, and rule of law, and for other purposes."
  • In October 2009, Paul and Kucinich were the only two Members of Congress to vote against House Resolution 175 condemning the government of Iran for “state-sponsored persecution of its Bahá’í minority and its continued violation of the International Covenants on Human Rights.”
During the same Iowa debate, Dr. Paul said “Why shouldn’t Iran want a nuclear weapon?” and claimed it would give them more respect internationally. He rejects the "dangerous military confrontation approaching with Iran and supported by many in leadership on both sides of the aisle." Dr. Paul believes we should ignore Iran's nuclear program and claims the "CIA has confirmed they have no evidence Iran is working on a nuclear weapon".
  • He is referring to the 2007 National Intelligence Estimate which said Iran had halted its drive to produce nuclear weapons. The Texan is ignoring the March 2010 CIA report which concluded "Iran continues to develop a range of capabilities that could be applied to producing nuclear weapons, if a decision is made to do so." 
  • Three months later the then CIA Director, Leon Panetta, said the Iranians "are developing their nuclear capability and that raises concerns," and "[w]e think they have enough low-enriched uranium right now for two weapons."
On April 22, 2010 the House voted 403-11 to proceed with a conference which would further isolate Iran by cutting off its supplies of refined petroleum products such as gasoline. Under the proposed law, companies that export gasoline to Iran would be barred from the U.S. market. Despite Iran's massive oil reserves, the country has limited refining capacity and has to import the gasoline it requires. 
The lawmakers were acting to prevent Iran from producing nuclear weapons. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said, "We have waited long enough for diplomacy to work." Many lawmakers told the House that Iran's intentions are clear, and "now is the time to implement crippling sanctions on this reckless regime." Paul led the opposition to the "Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act," and told the House:
“I rise in strong opposition. I object to this entire push for war on Iran, however it is disguised. . . We hear war advocates on the floor today arguing that we cannot afford to sit around and wait for Iran to detonate a nuclear weapon. Where have we heard this before? Anyone remember then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s oft-repeated quip about Iraq: that we cannot wait for the smoking gun to appear as a mushroom cloud. We need to see all this for what it is: Propaganda to speed us to war against Iran for the benefit of special interests. . . A vote for sanctions on Iran is a vote for war against Iran.”
Dr. Paul does not view Iran as a threat to the stability of the Middle East. Iran does have terrible financial problems, but nevertheless, the nation's official budget lists over $1 billion which is distributed to terrorist organizations on an annual basis. They also train and provide guidance and weapons to numerous terrorist and militant groups. 
  • They have been meddling in Iraq, Lebanon and Gaza for many years. Iran's nuclear activities and human rights abuses are not the only ones that violate UN resolutions. The Islamic Republic's support for terrorist organizations does so as well. 
  • He also defends the Islamic Republic by claiming they are not attacking anyone, but Iran is the chief sponsor of terrorist groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Their oil wealth has made them the central banker of terrorism, and they are working diligently to undermine the government of Iraq. 
  • Iran has supplied al Qaeda in Iraq with weapons and they have supported several Iraqi militant groups such as the Mahdi Army, which are responsible for the deaths of many U.S. troops. They have also supplied Hamas with the over 10,000 rockets which have been fired at Israel.
  • Paul is against placing any sanctions on Iran in response to the nuclear weapons program and human rights violations. The new sanctions are aimed at the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) which facilitates the operations of its Revolutionary Guard. The Central Bank is used to circumvent existing international sanctions.
  • The sanctions would freeze Iran out of the global financial system and make it difficult for them to clear billions in oil sales every month. Dr. Paul is in opposition to sanctions because he believes the Iran threat is both small and exaggerated, and sanctions “would make matters worse.”  
During the Iowa debate, Paul said: “We started it in 1953… we installed the Shah, and the blowback came in 1979… it’s been going on because we just plain don’t mind our own business. That’s our problem!”
  • On July 1, 2009, he wrote in The Washington Times, "in 1953, our CIA helped overthrow Mohammad Mosaddeq, the democratically elected prime minister of Iran and installed the Shah of Iran, a ruthless dictator. The blowback from our actions was in large part responsible for the extremist Iranian Revolution of 1979, the taking of our hostages and the many problems we have had with Iran ever since. So much of our intervention makes no sense."
In response, former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) said:
"I don’t apologize for that. I don’t apologize for the Iranian people being free for a long time and now they’re under a mullacracy that tramples the rights of women, tramples the rights of gays, tramples the rights of people all throughout their society and it’s the greatest supporter of terrorism in the Middle East and around the world. . . Anyone who suggests Iran is not a threat to this country is not seeing the world very clearly."
The United States did not install the Shah and Prime Minister Mossadegh's fall was not due to CIA dirty tricks. It happened because hundreds of thousands of Iranians poured into the streets to demand his departure and return of the Shah.  Since the late 1940s the United States had been friendly to the nationalist movement in Iran, and America was instrumental in forcing the Soviet Union in 1946 to leave the nation after WW II and to return control of its oil fields.
  • America urged Britain to revise its 1908 oil agreement with Iran and to compromise on a more equitable pact. The United States maintained a neutral position until it became apparent the Prime Minister was working with the communist Tudeh Party to seize dictatorial control. 
  • During the Mossadegh crisis, the Shah resisted efforts to have the Prime Minister removed illegally. The Shah was well aware of Iran’s Constitutional requirements, but they were ignored by the Prime Minister. 
  • Winston Churchill called Mossadegh "an elderly lunatic bent on wrecking his country and handing it over to the Communists." 
  • To keep power, Mossadegh organized a rigged election and claimed a 99.9% victory. He dismissed parliament and was ruling as a dictator. The nation was suffering from an economic meltdown because Mossadegh had nationalized the oil industry, and Britain had organized a boycott in response.  Because of the economic upheaval, once supportive nationalists, clerics, and army officers peeled away from Mossadegh.
When the Shah finally took action after the fake national referendum, he was acting within his Constitutional rights. He always had the power to dismiss the prime minister, and under the Constitution the armed forces were controlled by the Shah, not the Prime Minister.  Mossadegh tried to unilaterally change the Constitution and ignored the Shah’s order. He was successful in forcing the Shah into exile, but was himself dethroned in a counter coup.
  • Dr. Paul is correct in noting the coup was covertly supported by the United States and Great Britain. When Mossadegh defied the Shah, the country experienced three days of near chaos. 
  • The CIA did print leaflets against Mossadegh and the agency attempted to stir up opposition, but the Iranian people were already outraged over what had happened. The clerical opposition to Mossadegh was far more important than anything done by the CIA.  
  • It should also be noted that for decades the United States pressured the Shah to democratize.
After the coup the Shah would rule for 25 more years. It is now viewed as Iran’s golden age. He modernized the economy, granting rights to women, protecting religious freedoms, aligning with the United States, and maintaining some ties with Israel. The nation’s standard of living increased significantly.
The Ayatollah Khomeini then imposed a theocracy and quickly murdered far more people than the number tormented by the Shah's secret police, SAVAK, during the preceding 25 years. All political and religious opposition has been denied ever since.
Ahmadinejad has warned Western leaders to follow the path of God [Islam] or “vanish from the face of the earth“. Lawmakers in both political parties have denounced the Iranian president for his skepticism regarding the Holocaust. Onc again, while Dr. Paul is always the first lawmaker to criticize Israel, he ignores all of Iran’s outrageous statements and actions. In May of 2006, Ahmadinejad toldDer Spiegel, a German news magazine:
"One group of scholars or persons, most of them politically motivated, say the Holocaust occurred. Then there is the group of scholars who represent the opposite position and have therefore been imprisoned for the most part. Hence, an impartial group has to come together to investigate and to render an opinion on this very important subject, because the clarification of this issue will contribute to the solution of global problems. Under the pretext of the Holocaust, a very strong polarization has taken place in the world and fronts have been formed. It would therefore be very good if an international and impartial group looked into the matter in order to clarify it once and for all. Normally, governments promote and support the work of researchers on historical events and do not put them in prison."  
 ·  · Share

American Coptic Christian filmmaker behind film used to cover Libya ambassador assasination

check this out from

Real identity of filmmaker Sam Bacile - California Coptic Christian convicted of financial crimes

"The AP located Bacile after obtaining his cell phone number from Morris Sadek, a conservative Coptic Christian in the U.S. who had promoted the anti-Muslim film in recent days on his website." Merrybrit (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC) is a more reliable link for the same news article. —Cupco 02:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
  • More nitty gritty (company name, copy of the casting call) at [9]Wnt (talk) 03:53, 13 September 2012 

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nakoula Basseley Nakoula (born c. 1957), also known as Mark Basseley YoussefYousseff M. Basseley,Nicola BacilyErwin SalamehAhmad Hamdy, and Malid Ahlawi, is an American Coptic Christianfilmmaker who serves as manager for the company that produced the anti-Muslim film Innocence of Muslims.[1][2][3]

[edit]Life and career

Nakoula pleaded no contest in 2010 to federal bank fraud charges in California and was ordered to pay $794,701 in restitution. He was also sentenced to 21 months in federal prison. Following his release in June 2011,[4] he was ordered not to use computers or the Internet for five years without approval from his probation officer.[1]
Although Nakoula has denied being the film's pseudonymous director Sam Bacile of the controversialInnocence of Muslims film, the Associated Press reported that the cellphone number Bacile used for an interview matched Nakoula's address.[5][6][7]


[edit]External links

Why not highlighting more data on the film makers?

I wonder why the names of the film makers have not been highlighted in red to start pages on them as
After putting internal inks to wikipedia i found that the fisrt 4 names already have pages. Please put them linked internaly to this page.--Ashashyou (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Sam Bacile is currently a redirect here so should not be linked in this article. Prior to that, it linked to Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, but the connection to the two remains unproven so that is inappropriate for BLP reasons. Nil Einne (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Nicola Bacily is currently a redirect to Nakoula Basseley Nakoula. This doesn't appear to be disputed or controversial so I won't change it but clearly a link to both of them in this article doesn't make sense as long as that remains the case. Nil Einne (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Steve Klein goes to a disambiguation page, the primary target being Steven Klein. It is not clear to me whether this photographer is the guy involved or not, in fact my impression is that it is unlikely that he is the guy involved with this film. Under the circumstances it should not be linked, as being associated with the film incorrectly could have consequences for the person concerned. -- Q Chris (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
What about the rest of the names? should not they be in red?? Also the original pages on wikipedia should not link to those name as long as they are debateable? I mean as long as the pages on the wikipedia have been approved even with redirects, then we can put them in the article. Or we can put the names in red according to the neutral point of view.--Ashashyou(talk) 12:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

‘It Makes Me Sick’: Actress in Muhammed Movie Says She Was Deceived, Had No Idea It Was About Islam

‘It Makes Me Sick’: Actress in Muhammed Movie Says She Was Deceived, Had No Idea It Was About Islam
The story of the Muhammed movie which sparked deadly protests in Libya gets weirder. The actors who appeared in it had no idea they were starring in anti-Islam propaganda which depicts Muhammed as a child molester and thug. They were deceived by the film's director, believing they were appearing in a film about the life of a generic Egyptian 2,000 years ago.
Cindy Lee Garcia, an actress from Bakersfield, Calif., has a small role in the Muhammed movie as a woman whose young daughter is given to Muhammed to marry. But in a phone interview this afternoon, Garcia told us she had no idea she was participating in an offensive spoof on the life of Muhammed when she answered a casting call through an agency last summer and got the part.
[copyvio elided —Cupco 23:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)]
"I called Sam and said, 'Why did you do this?' and he said, 'I'm tired of radical Islamists killing each other. Let other actors know it's not their fault.'"
Garcia isn't satisfied simply knowing it wasn't her fault.
"I'm going to sue his butt off."
Update: The entire 80-member cast and crew of the film have released a statement saying they were misled. Via CNN:
The entire cast and crew are extremely upset and feel taken advantage of by the producer. We are 100% not behind this film and were grossly misled about its intent and purpose. We are shocked by the drastic re-writes of the script and lies that were told to all involved. We are deeply saddened by the tragedies that have occurred.

Commentary (conservative jewish magazine)

Who is “Sam Bacile”?

here’s basically no evidence that “Sam Bacile” even exists. The closest person who fits that description (at least electronically) is a self-proclaimed Egyptian “movie-maker” in California, who calls himself “Sam Bassel” on Facebook. Bassel has been registered on Facebook since 2010, and has posted regularly about the movies he supposedly produces, including the one that was used as a pretext for the Egyptian riots.
“Hello, I am a producer in a America and I live in Hollywood California,” he wrote in a July 15 post, well before the controversy erupted in Egypt. “I recently produced a movie that I believe to be one of the most historically important movie of our times. It is a 2 hour long movie about the entire life of the Prophet Muhammad from start to finish. Everything that is depicted in the movie is very true and well documented in all historical books that are found and taught in all Islamic countries.”
Bassel has posted about the film often over the past few months. According to one post, the movie took Bassel 12 years to complete and “blames America for the wars that occurred recently in Iraq and Afghanistan.”
UPDATE: The Facebook page belonging to “Sam Bassel” was apparently taken down a few hours after I posted this, but PolicyMic published some screenshots. Hold on, though, the story gets weirder. PolicyMic also flags an AP article that suggests Bacile/Bassel may actually be a man named Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who claims to be a “manager” for the company that produced the film, as well as a Coptic Christian. Nakoula denied that he posed as Bacile, but the details dug up by the AP sure sound suspicious: