anti-cop
anti-NSA
anti-war on terrorism
seen on internet ... Every day, from all over the nation, police are murdering people from 13 year old teens to 90 year old grandfathers. Two years ago, DHS purchased over one million targets that were photos of infants in diapers, pregnant mothers, senior men and women and white males. Since then, the police have been shooting, Tasering and beating people to death all over the country. Here’s another one.
Oklahoma Police Beat [Unarmed] Man to Death Before Confiscating Cell Phone Camera that Captured Beating
http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com
With video like 'Kansas cops bully man into arrest for trying to record them', and Reports such as 'Ten Rules for Recording Cops'; 'Photography is not a crime's Carlos Miller regularly goes in harms way to secure and ensure the right to document servants of the State doing the public business.. and is certainly worth mad Liberty Crypto-Dollars to do with what he may
Quote from: PINAC
Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC was launched in 2007 after Miami multimedia journalist Carlos Miller was arrested for taking photos of five Miami police officers while working on an article for a local news site.
Charged with nine misdemeanors, Miller created the blog to document his trial, thinking he would run it for a few months at the most.
But as his trial was prolonged for longer than a year in a series of rejected plea deals, judicial resignations and prosecutorial scandals, the blog grew in popularity with readers from around the country sending him stories of photographers getting arrested, which he documented on the blog, revealing an epidemic crackdown against citizens with cameras. By the time he went to trial a year later, he was acquitted of all charges except resisting arrest, a conviction he had overturned on appeal by representing himself.
With video like 'Kansas cops bully man into arrest for trying to record them', and Reports such as 'Ten Rules for Recording Cops'; 'Photography is not a crime's Carlos Miller regularly goes in harms way to secure and ensure the right to document servants of the State doing the public business.. and is certainly worth mad Liberty Crypto-Dollars to do with what he may
Boston Marathon Explosions Reveal Hypocrisy Behind Police ...
-
photographyisnotacrime.com/.../boston-marathon-explosions-re...
Apr 16, 2013 - The cop goes before a review board which insulates him from the law -- he doesn
-
, there is no evidence that terrorists use cameras to plan their attacks as security expert Bruce Schneier wrote in 2008.
Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography.
Photographers have been harassed,questioned, detained, arrested or worse, and declared to be unwelcome. We’ve been repeatedly told towatch out for photographers, especially suspicious ones. Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required.
Except that it’s nonsense. The 9/11 terrorists didn’t photograph anything. Nor did the London transport bombers, the Madrid subway bombers, or the liquid bombers arrested in 2006. Timothy McVeigh didn’t photograph the Oklahoma City Federal Building. The Unabomber didn’t photograph anything; neither did shoe-bomber Richard Reid. Photographs aren’t being found amongst the papers of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IRA wasn’t known for its photography. Even those manufactured terrorist plotsthat the US government likes to talk about — the Ft. Dix terrorists, the JFK airport bombers, the Miami 7, the Lackawanna 6 — no photography.
Given that real terrorists, and even wannabe terrorists, don’t seem to photograph anything, why is it such pervasive conventional wisdom that terrorists photograph their targets? Why are our fears so great that we have no choice but to be suspicious of any photographer?
Because it’s a movie-plot threat.
The Boston Marathon explosions, which so far have claimed three lives, took place less than 24 hours as of this writing, so there is still a lot of speculation, even though no suspects have been identified or arrested nor has a motive been determined.
But that didn’t stop an alert citizen from tackling a 20-year-old Saudi man as he was running from the scene – as you can imagine countless others must have been – and detain him for Boston police who determined that he was a person of interest.
photographyisnotacrime.com/.../boston-marathon-explosions-re...
Apr 16, 2013 - The cop goes before a review board which insulates him from the law -- he doesn
, there is no evidence that terrorists use cameras to plan their attacks as security expert Bruce Schneier wrote in 2008.
Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography.
Photographers have been harassed,questioned, detained, arrested or worse, and declared to be unwelcome. We’ve been repeatedly told towatch out for photographers, especially suspicious ones. Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required.Except that it’s nonsense. The 9/11 terrorists didn’t photograph anything. Nor did the London transport bombers, the Madrid subway bombers, or the liquid bombers arrested in 2006. Timothy McVeigh didn’t photograph the Oklahoma City Federal Building. The Unabomber didn’t photograph anything; neither did shoe-bomber Richard Reid. Photographs aren’t being found amongst the papers of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IRA wasn’t known for its photography. Even those manufactured terrorist plotsthat the US government likes to talk about — the Ft. Dix terrorists, the JFK airport bombers, the Miami 7, the Lackawanna 6 — no photography.Given that real terrorists, and even wannabe terrorists, don’t seem to photograph anything, why is it such pervasive conventional wisdom that terrorists photograph their targets? Why are our fears so great that we have no choice but to be suspicious of any photographer?Because it’s a movie-plot threat.
The Boston Marathon explosions, which so far have claimed three lives, took place less than 24 hours as of this writing, so there is still a lot of speculation, even though no suspects have been identified or arrested nor has a motive been determined.
But that didn’t stop an alert citizen from tackling a 20-year-old Saudi man as he was running from the scene – as you can imagine countless others must have been – and detain him for Boston police who determined that he was a person of interest.
PINAC - Photography is Not a Crime
-
photographyisnotacrime.com/.../viral-video-of-college-cops-barging-int...
Dec 12, 2012 - Viral Video of College Cops Barging into Dorm Room Sparks Reviewwithin Police Department - Photography is Not a Crime: PINAC.
photographyisnotacrime.com/.../viral-video-of-college-cops-barging-int...
Dec 12, 2012 - Viral Video of College Cops Barging into Dorm Room Sparks Reviewwithin Police Department - Photography is Not a Crime: PINAC.http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2013/10... - The Objective ...
-
https://www.facebook.com/theobjectivereview/posts/250858675062939
The Objective Review First Amendment violation? Freelance photographers take pictures and record stuff all the time to sell to media companies what happened ...
https://www.facebook.com/theobjectivereview/posts/250858675062939
No comments:
Post a Comment