anti-semitism: Chesterton for making what they see as anti-Jewish comments during two turn-of-the-century scandals involving false allegations against Jews — the Dreyfus Affair and the Marconi Scandal. Alderman said that in the book “The New Jerusalem” (1921), Chesterton said Jews couldn’t be loyal to the countries in which they live because their first loyalty is to their co-religionists scattered around the world. Chesterton’s views on Jews may have been best expressed in an essay titled “The Problem of Zionism,” in which he said that Jews holding high public office should dress as “orientals,” to remind people of their allegiance and origin.
neo-nazi: Publications supporting the neo-nazi ITP in the UK are Final Conflict, The Voice of St George and Candour (which was previously published by A. K. Chesterton and is the longest running far right publication in Britain).
neo-facist A.K. Chesterton's The New Unhappy Lords has been described by as "the Mein Kampf of British neo-fascism by A. K. Chesterton, founder the racialist National Front"
This not-a-terrorist was inspired Chesterton and Ron Paul: Shane Schumerth Politics Crazy Episcopal School Shooter
Mar 06, 2012 · Shane Schumerth shot and killed the headmistress of the Episcopal High School near Jacksonville Fla after he was fired. He returned packing an AK-47 assault-style rifle in a guitar case. He was engrossed with G.K. Chesterton and Ron Paul libertarian politics. He was heard talking more about fascism communist manifesto and marxism rather than the spanish classes he was hired to teach. He was released from his first public school teaching assignment because of problems
G. K. Chesterton - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gilbert Keith Chesterton, KC*SG (29 May 1874 – 14 June 1936) better known as G.K. Chesterton, was an English writer, lay theologian, poet, dramatist, journalist ...
G. K. Chesterton Quotes - The Quotations Page
.Topics
- .Anti-Semitism
- .Facism -
- The New Unhappy Lords has been described as "the Mein Kampf of British neo-fascism
- .IHS press - reprints Chesterton works
- .Infowars - endorses
- .Lew Rockwell reprints his poetry
- .Nationalism England had lost its national soul through integration of its culture with more “barbaric cultures” that it had previously conquered
- .National Front - racialist group founded by Chesterton
- .Ron Paul - co-authored book with Chesterton
- .Terrorist - Shane Schumerth Politics Crazy Episcopal School Shooter was admirer of author
- The New Unhappy Lords has been described as "the Mein Kampf of British neo-fascism
.Anti-Semitism
Saint G.K. Chesterton? Canonization Examination Begins, Despite Anti-Semitism Accusations
The Huffington Post · 4 days ago
Known for his wit and ability to find truth in apparent paradox ... they see as anti-Jewish comments during two turn-of-the-century scandals involving false
http://fringewatcher.blogspot.com/2006/02/ihs-press-potential-fascist-antisemitic.html
IHS Founder John Sharpe has ties to Legion of St. Louis, a traditionalist website which peddles anti-semitic/anti-Judaic literature such as Henry Ford's International Jew, A.K. Chesterton's The New Unhappy Lords (what Anger describes as "the Mein Kampf of British neo-fascism by A. K. Chesterton, founder the racialist National Front") and Judaism's Strange Gods by Holocaust-revisionist and "white-separatist" Michael Hoffman II.
Saint G.K. Chesterton? Canonization Examination Begins, Despite Anti-Semitism Accusations
The Huffington Post · 4 days ago
Known for his wit and ability to find truth in apparent paradox ... they see as anti-Jewish comments during two turn-of-the-century scandals involving false
Christians and Jews are mounting campaigns for and against a path to sainthood for British writer G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936), one of the world’s best-known Catholic converts. In the U.S., Chesterton is frequently cited by conservative Christians of all denominations.
Christians and Jews are mounting campaigns for and against a path to sainthood for British writer G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936), one of the world’s best-known Catholic converts. In the U.S., Chesterton is frequently cited by conservative Christians of all denominations.
canonizing the 300-pound cigar-chomping writer would damage his reputation — and that of the Catholic Church — because so many people regard Chesterton as anti-Semitic. That’s a viewpoint echoed by two leading British Jews, Simon Mayers and Geoffrey Alderman. They condemn Chesterton for making what they see as anti-Jewish comments during two turn-of-the-century scandals involving false allegations against Jews — the Dreyfus Affair and the Marconi Scandal.
Alderman said that in the book “The New Jerusalem” (1921), Chesterton said Jews couldn’t be loyal to the countries in which they live because their first loyalty is to their co-religionists scattered around the world. Chesterton’s views on Jews may have been best expressed in an essay titled “The Problem of Zionism,” in which he said that Jews holding high public office should dress as “orientals,” to remind people of their allegiance and origin.
http://fringewatcher.blogspot.com/2006/02/ihs-press-potential-fascist-antisemitic.html
IHS Founder John Sharpe has ties to Legion of St. Louis, a traditionalist website which peddles anti-semitic/anti-Judaic literature such as Henry Ford's International Jew, A.K. Chesterton's The New Unhappy Lords (what Anger describes as "the Mein Kampf of British neo-fascism by A. K. Chesterton, founder the racialist National Front") and Judaism's Strange Gods by Holocaust-revisionist and "white-separatist" Michael Hoffman II.
.IHS press
Coming soon from IHS. The presses are rolling as fast as time, resources, and personnel will permit. Look for these and other titles that continue to lay the foundation for the rebuilding of Christendom:
The Catholic Social Movement, by Henry Somerville.
Last of the Realists, by Harold Robbins.
The Portugal of Salazar, by Michael Derrick.
William cobbett, by G.K. Chesterton.
Later volumes will include additional titles by Belloc, Chesterton, McNabb, and Robbins, and new offerings by Frs. Denis Fahey, Edward Cahill, Drs. George O'Brien and Charles Devas, and many of the other Distributists and Social Catholics.
Later volumes will include additional titles by Belloc, Chesterton, McNabb, and Robbins, and new offerings by Frs. Denis Fahey, Edward Cahill, Drs. George O'Brien and Charles Devas, and many of the other Distributists and Social Catholics.
.Infowars
Andrew Hoffman
Infowars
Chesterton vs. the New World Order
Never has there been so little discussion about the nature of men as now, when, for the first time, any one can discuss it. The old restriction meant that only the orthodox were allowed to discuss religion. Modern liberty means that nobody is allowed to discuss it. Good taste, the last and vilest of human superstitions, has succeeded in silencing us where all the rest have failed. There are some people, nevertheless — and I am one of them — who think that the most practical and important thing about a man is still his view of the universe. --G.K. Chesterton, Heretics (1905)
Each individual human life has inherent meaning, value, and beauty. This may seem to be a relatively non-controversial affirmation of human dignity, but this idea is precisely what was being denied by the intelligentsia and oligarchy of Chesterton’s day (the early 1900s in Britain), and it is precisely what is being stomped out by the New World Order today. Chesterton waged an intellectual battle against the eugenicists before people had even heard of Hitler in his book Eugenics and Other Evils (published in 1917 but written years before). Throughout all of his extensive writings, however, he made the case for life and for belief in a reality that goes beyond what we can directly ascertain with our five senses.
At any innocent tea-table we may easily hear a man say, "Life is not worth living." We regard it as we regard the statement that it is a fine day; nobody thinks that it can possibly have any serious effect on the man or on the world. And yet if that utterance were really believed, the world would stand on its head. Murderers would be given medals for saving men from life; firemen would be denounced for keeping men from death; poisons would be used as medicines; doctors would be called in when people were well; the Royal Humane Society would be rooted out like a horde of assassins. Yet we never speculate as to whether the conversational pessimist will strengthen or disorganize society; for we are convinced that theories do not matter. –G.K. Chesterton, Heretics
Unfortunately, we live in the days that Chesterton predicted would sprout from the philosophical roots of Nihilism. The men who covered up and carried out 9/11 are given medals and promotions and proclaimed by President Bush as national heroes. Abortion is often celebrated as the prevention of a child being brought into the world under difficult circumstances, as if one is better off being dead than separated from the lap of luxury. Cancer-virus filled vaccines are sold and perhaps soon mandated as tools of disease prevention. Patriots are now labeled as terrorists. This did not happen in a vacuum. It happened as a predictable result of the beliefs of the elite and unfortunately the less defined “mainstream” dogma of nihilistic consumerism.
The great march of mental destruction will go on. Everything will be denied. Everything will become a creed. It is a reasonable position to deny the stones in the street; it will be a religious dogma to assert them. It is a rational thesis that we are all in a dream; it will be a mystical sanity to say that we are all awake. Fires will be kindled to testify that two and two make four. Swords will be drawn to prove that leaves are green in summer. We shall be left defending, not only the incredible virtues and sanities of human life, but something more incredible still, this huge impossible universe which stares us in the face. We shall fight for visible prodigies as if they were invisible. We shall look on the impossible grass and the skies with a strange courage. We shall be of those who have seen and yet have believed. –G.K. Chesterton, Concluding Remarks
Years before Orwell’s 1984, Chesterton saw that the philosophical bent towards Nihilism would make those who proclaim 2+2=4 into enemies of the state. Thanks to the “climate change” fear mongering and pseudo-science, those of us who claim that it’s normal for the weather to be hotter in the summer and colder in the winter will soon have to pay for our heresy with increased carbon taxes to Al Gore and Goldman Sachs. Even today, some people are more apt to believe what they are told on television than what they observe in the physical world around them with their own senses. If the TV says there are no chemtrails, then the white lines hovering in the sky for hours do not exist. If the TV says Osama Bin Laden took down the towers, to look at Building 7 collapsing and draw the obvious inference of controlled demolition is the sure sign of a tin foil hat wearing potential domestic Al Qaeda member.
The weak point in the whole of [Thomas] Carlyle's case for aristocracy lies, indeed, in his most celebrated phrase. Carlyle said that men were mostly fools. Christianity, with a surer and more reverent realism, says that they are all fools. This doctrine is sometimes called the doctrine of original sin. It may also be described as the doctrine of the equality of men. But the essential point of it is merely this, that whatever primary and far-reaching moral dangers affect any man, affect all men. All men can be criminals, if tempted; all men can be heroes, if inspired. And this doctrine does away altogether with Carlyle's pathetic belief (or any one else's pathetic belief) in "the wise few." There are no wise few. Every aristocracy that has ever existed has behaved, in all essential points, exactly like a small mob.-- G.K. Chesterton, Chapter XII "Paganism and Mr. Lowes Dickinson"
Chesterton cuts to the heart of the problem of any government system; it is operated by corrupt and corruptible men. When the few are given sweeping powers over the private affairs of the many, the results, historically, have never resulted in the felicity of the average individual in the system. Most parents would not trust their 16 year old son to be solely responsible for their house, car, and credit cards for a weekend. Why then should we trust the purse strings of the entire U.S. financial system to Henry Paulson or Timothy Geithner?
Infowars
Chesterton vs. the New World Order
Never has there been so little discussion about the nature of men as now, when, for the first time, any one can discuss it. The old restriction meant that only the orthodox were allowed to discuss religion. Modern liberty means that nobody is allowed to discuss it. Good taste, the last and vilest of human superstitions, has succeeded in silencing us where all the rest have failed. There are some people, nevertheless — and I am one of them — who think that the most practical and important thing about a man is still his view of the universe. --G.K. Chesterton, Heretics (1905)
Each individual human life has inherent meaning, value, and beauty. This may seem to be a relatively non-controversial affirmation of human dignity, but this idea is precisely what was being denied by the intelligentsia and oligarchy of Chesterton’s day (the early 1900s in Britain), and it is precisely what is being stomped out by the New World Order today. Chesterton waged an intellectual battle against the eugenicists before people had even heard of Hitler in his book Eugenics and Other Evils (published in 1917 but written years before). Throughout all of his extensive writings, however, he made the case for life and for belief in a reality that goes beyond what we can directly ascertain with our five senses.
At any innocent tea-table we may easily hear a man say, "Life is not worth living." We regard it as we regard the statement that it is a fine day; nobody thinks that it can possibly have any serious effect on the man or on the world. And yet if that utterance were really believed, the world would stand on its head. Murderers would be given medals for saving men from life; firemen would be denounced for keeping men from death; poisons would be used as medicines; doctors would be called in when people were well; the Royal Humane Society would be rooted out like a horde of assassins. Yet we never speculate as to whether the conversational pessimist will strengthen or disorganize society; for we are convinced that theories do not matter. –G.K. Chesterton, Heretics
Unfortunately, we live in the days that Chesterton predicted would sprout from the philosophical roots of Nihilism. The men who covered up and carried out 9/11 are given medals and promotions and proclaimed by President Bush as national heroes. Abortion is often celebrated as the prevention of a child being brought into the world under difficult circumstances, as if one is better off being dead than separated from the lap of luxury. Cancer-virus filled vaccines are sold and perhaps soon mandated as tools of disease prevention. Patriots are now labeled as terrorists. This did not happen in a vacuum. It happened as a predictable result of the beliefs of the elite and unfortunately the less defined “mainstream” dogma of nihilistic consumerism.
The great march of mental destruction will go on. Everything will be denied. Everything will become a creed. It is a reasonable position to deny the stones in the street; it will be a religious dogma to assert them. It is a rational thesis that we are all in a dream; it will be a mystical sanity to say that we are all awake. Fires will be kindled to testify that two and two make four. Swords will be drawn to prove that leaves are green in summer. We shall be left defending, not only the incredible virtues and sanities of human life, but something more incredible still, this huge impossible universe which stares us in the face. We shall fight for visible prodigies as if they were invisible. We shall look on the impossible grass and the skies with a strange courage. We shall be of those who have seen and yet have believed. –G.K. Chesterton, Concluding Remarks
Years before Orwell’s 1984, Chesterton saw that the philosophical bent towards Nihilism would make those who proclaim 2+2=4 into enemies of the state. Thanks to the “climate change” fear mongering and pseudo-science, those of us who claim that it’s normal for the weather to be hotter in the summer and colder in the winter will soon have to pay for our heresy with increased carbon taxes to Al Gore and Goldman Sachs. Even today, some people are more apt to believe what they are told on television than what they observe in the physical world around them with their own senses. If the TV says there are no chemtrails, then the white lines hovering in the sky for hours do not exist. If the TV says Osama Bin Laden took down the towers, to look at Building 7 collapsing and draw the obvious inference of controlled demolition is the sure sign of a tin foil hat wearing potential domestic Al Qaeda member.
The weak point in the whole of [Thomas] Carlyle's case for aristocracy lies, indeed, in his most celebrated phrase. Carlyle said that men were mostly fools. Christianity, with a surer and more reverent realism, says that they are all fools. This doctrine is sometimes called the doctrine of original sin. It may also be described as the doctrine of the equality of men. But the essential point of it is merely this, that whatever primary and far-reaching moral dangers affect any man, affect all men. All men can be criminals, if tempted; all men can be heroes, if inspired. And this doctrine does away altogether with Carlyle's pathetic belief (or any one else's pathetic belief) in "the wise few." There are no wise few. Every aristocracy that has ever existed has behaved, in all essential points, exactly like a small mob.-- G.K. Chesterton, Chapter XII "Paganism and Mr. Lowes Dickinson"
Chesterton cuts to the heart of the problem of any government system; it is operated by corrupt and corruptible men. When the few are given sweeping powers over the private affairs of the many, the results, historically, have never resulted in the felicity of the average individual in the system. Most parents would not trust their 16 year old son to be solely responsible for their house, car, and credit cards for a weekend. Why then should we trust the purse strings of the entire U.S. financial system to Henry Paulson or Timothy Geithner?
.Lew Rockwell
.Ron Paul
Cecil Chesterton was and journalist and editor who was associated with the Fabian Society and later worked almost exclusively for The New Age, where he was an important contributor. In 1911, he became assistant editor on Hilaire Belloc's new weekly, The Eye-Witness, and when it folded in 1912, he bought the paper and renamed it The New Witness, which he edited until when he went off to war. His books include Gladstonian Ghosts, G. K. Chesterton: A Criticism, and A History of the United States.
Co-author: Hilaire Belloc was twice elected to the British Parliament and is a prolific author on a wide range of political, economic, social and historical issues. Congressman Ron Paul served in Congress during the late 1970s and early 1980s, where he served on the House Banking committee. He returned to Congress in 1997 where he serves on the Financial Services Committee as the vice-chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee. He is also the author of several books, including Challenge to Liberty; The Case for Gold and A Republic, If You Can Keep It. He lives in Lake Jackson, Texas. Prince Sforza Ruspoli is the prince of Cerveteri, Italy, the count of Vignanello, and the honorary vice president of the promotional committee of the Banca del Mezzogiorno at the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. He served as ambassador of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta to the State of Malta, of which order he is currently a Knight, and is a member of the Executive Committee of the Bank of Rome and the founder of the Centers of Agrarian Action.
The Distributist Review: Ron Paul and Hilaire Belloc
But Ron Paul has chosen the deliberate path of the rebel, much as Belloc andChesterton did. ... G.K. Chesterton Institute for Faith and Culture;
.
IHS Press will issue a new edition of The Party System with a foreword by Ron Paul. This is appropriate, since Congressman Paul does not quite fit into the standard political categories dictated by the two-party system. Actually, few of us do, but all of us find ourselves forced to hold our noses and vote, usually for the best of a bad lot. But Ron Paul has chosen the deliberate path of the rebel, much as Belloc and Chesterton did.
What are the Chesterton Prophecies? England had lost its national soul through the unintended integration of its culture with more “barbaric cultures” that it had previously conquered
- 2 replies from September 27 2013
You are Ron Paul's Media! Remove this section of ads by registering. ... America’s future may have been foretold in G. K. Chesterton’s, The Flying Inn (1914).
America’s future may have been foretold in G. K. Chesterton’s, The Flying Inn (1914). The book provides present day Americans with an opportunity to understand what is happening to their loss of culture and of national sovereignty. The book consists of a “fictional” account of how England had been stripped of its cultural identity. The book was written at the end of the British imperialistic period of dominance in which England had collapsed under the sheer weight of attempting to maintain its vast empire. In the book, Chesterton maintains that England lost far more than its preeminent position as the world’s sole super power. He postulated that England had lost its national soul through the unintended integration of its culture with more “barbaric cultures” that it had previously conquere
.Sainthood
===========================================================
.source
News about G.K. Chesterton
bing.com/news
Saint GK Chesterton? Bishop begins preliminary tests for canonisation of writer
The Independent · 4 days agoThe Annoying Genius: G. K. Chesterton
aleteia.org · 1 day ago
American Chesterton Society | G.K. Chesterton for the 21st …
Gilbert Keith Chesterton - Biography and Works. Search Texts, …
G.K. Chesterton (Author of The Man Who Was Thursday)
- Rating: 4/5 ·
- 4,521 reviews
About G.K. Chesterton: Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) cannot be summed up in one sentence. Nor in one paragraph. In fact, in spite of the fine biog...
gk chesterton | Barnes & Noble
Amazon.com: G.K. Chesterton: Books, Biography, Blog, …
G.K. Chesterton
About GK Chesterton Blogger Antiwar
100
10/16/2013
