Pages

Sunday, January 6, 2019

Omar Mateen Orlando Gay Club Mass Shooter Conspiracy Theory

Omar Mateen Orlando Gay Club Mass Shooter Conspiracy Theory --- ===
see Orlando Gay Club Mass Shooter Omar Mateen ---

Why are pro-russia pro-Iran propagandists trying to float obvious lying conspiracy theory to cover up whoever was backing Omar Mateen's attack on a gay night club?

Amazon sells fake news books: 
Orlando False Flag: The Clash of Histories Paperback – August 1, 2016
by Dr. Kevin J. Barrett (Author)

The mainstream media's version of the Orlando shooting – RADICAL MUSLIMS HATE GAYS, PLEASE SUPPORT GUN CONTROL – falls apart under critical examination. In this book, nineteen leading public intellectuals contest the official version of the Orlando shooting. Some consider the evidence suggesting the event was a false flag; others discuss the historical and cultural background and deconstruct the media propaganda. Orlando False Flag also covers apparent follow-up events, including the shootings in Dallas, Baton Rouge and Munich, and the truck attack in Nice, France. Following on the heels of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo and ANOTHER French False Flag, Orlando False Flag brings Kevin Barrett and colleagues' trenchant critique of the "war on terror" back home to the USA. “Kevin Barrett is to be applauded for Orlando False Flag, his latest instant anthology false flag exposé. It presents a variety of sometimes clashing views. As such it’s an example of much-needed radical informational democracy in print, devoted once again to the key challenge of our time: vast manipulative deception by the American Empire.” – Barrie Zwicker, author of Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11


About the Author


Kevin Barrett, an American Muslim and PhD Islamic Studies scholar, is one of America's best-known critics of the War on Terror. He has authored and edited several books, including ANOTHER French False Flag (2016) and We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo (2015) and appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets and been widely covered by print media. Dr. Barrett is a former teacher of French, Arabic, Islamic Studies, Humanities at colleges and universities in Paris, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Wisconsin. He currently works as a talk radio host, nonprofit organizer, editor at [russian media outlets] Veterans Today, and pundit at Press TV, Russia Today, al-Etejah and other international channels. His website is TruthJihad.com. “Mr. Barrett’s views . . . have outraged some Wisconsin legislators and generated a fierce debate about academic freedom.” – The New York Times Barrett “never expected to find himself carrying the banner for one of the most controversial theories of our times.” – Chicago Tribune “I consider Kevin Barrett the top analyst for false flags.” – Robert David Steele, former CIA covert operations specialist and pioneer of the Open Source Intelligence (OS-INT) movement Kevin Barrett should be “in the Charles River, floating down towards the harbor.” Bill O’Reilly, Fox News commentator


Review


Barrie Zwicker author of Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11
5.0 out of 5 starsFalse flag Deceptions—Orlando being a recent one—are frightening the public into support for wars and domestic repressions

August 6, 2016
Format: Paperback

(This brief review is based on a longer one I just posted at the Truth and Shadows blog)

Barely seven weeks after the murky events of the night of June 12th in Florida’s Pulse gay club, Kevin Barrett’s instant anthology is already providing valuable insights and perspectives.

The publishing speediness is unusual and also important because the urgency is great.

False flag operations—and this is what Orlando was—remain the prime drivers of the maximum illusion “war on terror” and ongoing [looks like pro-Russian propaganda] aggressive actions against Russia, China, Syria and others by the imperial American Empire, its allies and vassals—all masked as “the West.” World War III is not out of the question. The path to unimaginable destruction is being paved with the most sophisticated, deceptive and far-reaching fear campaign of all time, founded on the destabilizing delusion of the “extremist jihadist threat.”

This is why it’s so important that the anomalies and absurdities and impossibilities of each latest false flag op be revealed, somewhere, as early as possible. Barrett has undertaken this challenge. Shortly after the Charlie Hebdo events he published (in April 2015) We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo!: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11. Then shortly after San Bernardino he published (in January 2016) ANOTHER French False Flag?: Bloody Tracks from Paris to San Bernardino.

One of the strongest chapters in Orlando is Joachim Hagopian’s “Orlando’s Geopolitical Context: The Empire’s Post-9/11 Hegelian-Style Warfare Against Both the World and American Citizens.”

Hagopian at the outset offers, as his prime analytical tool, Hegel’s formula of problem-reaction-solution, successfully exploited repeatedly by typically deceptive rulers to consolidate power.

He reintroduces the formula at the beginning of each of his insightful and heavily footnoted analyses of, for instance, “9/11 Enemy Islam,” “Enemy Senator Paul Wellstone,” “Enemy Russia,” “Enemy China,” “Enemy Iran,” and “Enemy the American People.”

The Hegelian formula, while a powerful template, is not a be-all and end-all. Especially it becomes shaky when outcomes are confused with “solutions.” Hagopian falls prey to this confusion.

Nevertheless the sweep and detail of the context for Orlando that he provides is like a “Worldview for Dummies” that can be applied to all the major false flag ops mounted by the Anglo-American-Israeli nexus starting with 9/11.

A favourite quote in the book for me is: ”The best way to predict the future is to invent it.”—Theodore Hook.

Paradoxically, in a book founded on questioning, there still isn’t enough questioning—in the form of self-interrogation by some of the authors as to whether “facts” they report really are facts. Accordingly, the implied promise of the title of Part 1, “What Really Happened at Orlando?” cannot be fully delivered.

But the book as a whole resoundingly delivers an answer to a somewhat different question: “Can We Trust to the Tiniest Degree Any Official or Media Accounts of What Happened at Orlando?”

A chapter with that title would be the shortest chapter in publishing history. It would consist of “No!”

No comments:

Post a Comment